[Pré-Jogo] Estudiantes de La Plata x RB Bragantino

Gols Estudiantes de La Plata: N/D Gols RB Bragantino: N/D
Copa Sul-Americana - Fase de grupos Estádio: Jorge Luis Hirschi Data: 7 de Junho de 2023, 21:00 Transmissão: bet365, STAR+, ESPN 4 Link para Live Match Thread
Escalações:

Estudiantes de La Plata (3-1-4-2)	RB Bragantino (4-3-3)
Mariano Andujar, Santiago Núñez, Zaid Romero, Luciano Lollo, Jorge Rodriguez, Gastón Benedetti, Leonardo Godoy, José Sosa, Santiago Ascacibar, Mauro Boselli, Benjamín Rollheiser	Cleiton, Juninho Capixaba, Eduardo, Leonardo Realpe, Henry Mosquera, Ramires, Matheus Fernandes, Lucas Evangelista, Vitinho, Sasha, Thiago Borbas
Suplentes:	Suplentes:
Guido Carrillo, Matías Godoy, Juan Guasone, Eros Mancuso, Ezequiel Munoz, Emanuel Mas, Mauro Méndez, Mateo Pellegrino, Daniel Sappa, Deian Verón, Franco Zapiola, Fernando Zuqui	Alerrandro, Nathan Camargo, Praxedes, Lucão, Andrés Hurtado, Sorriso, Guilherme Lopes, Gustavinho, Werik Popó, Luan Freitas, Aderlan, Jadsom
Técnico: Eduardo Dominguez	Técnico: Pedro Caixinha

Arbitragem: Kevin Ortega (Árbitro Principal)

Lances

Han habido muchos cambios en la vida de mi hijo, una se ella es la escuela, las burlas por no tener cabello y una que otra mujer que cree que el cáncer se pasa por estar en la mismo aula de estudios y otras que bueno no digamos que lo llama mendigo, por haber pedido ayudas donaciones apoyo o como le quieran decir, Un día me dijo ¡Mama voy a morir, no quiero morirme aún quiero jugar Mario y otros juegos antes de morir ver otra película de Sonic, y muchas cosa con vos mamá no puedo! Es por eso que me dio motivo para seguir juntando para químios me he subido a buses a pedir a lugares a solicitar apoyo algunos me dicen que no casi la mayoría, y también algunos que han leído mi historia por Reddit me han ayudado no sólo con palabras si no aportando para sus medicamentos y químios y aún sigo buscando como pagarlas

Acabo de regresar con mi novia, cuando eramos ex ella se beso con un tipo, el detalle es que tenemos un negocio en común los dos con una amiga más, pero da la circunstancia que nos mudamos de local y ahora el local en el que estamos, cerca está con el tipo que se beso, yo le dije que no iba a pelear y nada de eso, por que obviamente no andábamos y no me voy a rebajar a ese nivel de reclamarle, pero ella dice que quiere su espacio laboral y que no llegue muy seguido al negocio que por lo menos 2 o 3 día en la semana no llegue.
Nosotros tenemos 8 años de noviazgo, los dos tenemos 24 años de edad
Que debo hacer? Debería de darle el tiempo que necesita o terminar la relación y salirme del negocio? Debería mejor relajarme solamente.....
Ayuda por fa :(

hola, desde hace un mes y medio estoy de novio con una chica muy linda que conocí hace un año en un grupo de internet, entre todos los miembros (entre ocho y diez personas) que habían ella era la unica chica, por lo que se darán cuenta lo que era el ambiente. Ella el año pasado se negaba rotundamente a salir con alguien de nuestro grupo por dos motivos: 1. Salió de una relación muy tóxica que le dejaron antecedentes y quería tomarse un tiempo para ella misma. 2. No quería despertar los celos de los demás.
Aún así ella conoció en persona a varios de ese grupo, incluído yo, que fui el primero. Ella me comentó que quería besarme esa vez, lo cual no me negué porque me llamaba la atención ya que teníamos una linda conexión y así fue. Nos besamos con intenciones de sacarnos las ganas de tener a alguien con quién desquitarse hormonalmente, lo cual entendía pero sentía mucho más.
Ella por su lado no quería tener nada con nadie, lo habíamos hablado un montón de veces aunque por otro lado se notaba que ella quería tener algo más conmigo pero su última relación la dejó prácticamente traumada y abrirse a amar le aterraba ya que le habían hecho daño, por lo que decidí esperarla y demostrarle que conmigo esas cosas no volverían a suceder.
Un mes más tarde ella conoció en persona a otro chico del mismo grupo, el cuál también la beso cuando se conocieron. Me enteré que iba a suceder, ese chico me lo contó días antes, justo estaba de vacaciones, sentí impotencia y la pasé horrible. Esta chica empezó a alejarse de mí eventualmente porque ese chico y otro más del grupo le comentaban que yo estaba muy embobado por ella, lo cuál ella se asustó y decidió apartarse para no florecer una ilusión porque ella no la iba a aceptar y no quería lastimarme.
Dejé de hablarme con ella y decidí abandonar el grupo porque no me hacía bien ese ambiente, ella se contactó conmigo y me aseguró que estaría ahí si necesitaba hablar con alguien.
Pasaron los meses y hablábamos muy poco (hola y chau), ella sola se dio cuenta que esos dos chicos no eran buena influencia, cortó comunicación con ellos y decidió citarme para hablar conmigo porque al final del día, no me quería perder.
Se dio una charla de todo lo sucedido, me pidió perdón por no haber tomado en cuenta mis emociones ni la de los demás, se sentía muy arrepentida de haberme lastimado porque no eran sus intenciones, se había tomado el resto del año en aprender sobre estas situaciones ya que nunca había recibido una enseñanza y aprendió con las consecuencias de sus actos.
Me cuesta perdonarla por lo que sucedió entre este chico y ella porque me había ilusionado mucho, me duele hasta hoy y sigo pensando en ese día. El chico me presumió como un premio el hecho de besarla, me destrozó. Realmente odio el egocentrismo de este chico que el acto de la chica.
Con lo que restaba del año volvimos a hablar, en enero nos volvimos a ver en persona y ya fuera del grupo y lejos de la gente empezamos a sembrar nuestra relación ya que después de todo ese año caótico para ella en el ámbito de amar decidió elegirme. Actualmente nos vemos seguido por suerte. Aunque cada tanto retomo este pensamiento de impotencia de ese chico, llegué a pensar formas de vengarme por lo sucedido, al menos con ella ya que "fue cómplice" de ese encuentro. Lo hablo con ella siempre y nunca se cansó aunque las últimas veces me sugirió de ir a un profesional ya que ella no sabe qué más decirme.
No sé si debería ir, tampoco sé si voy a poder superar esto algún día, cuando nos vemos en persona esos pensamientos desaparecen y disfruto el tiempo con ella, mientras que cuando estoy solo me termino nublando de pensamientos horribles de esta situación.

Today in a moment of chill I watched a new Vice News mini-documentary where the photojournalist that uncovered the Iran-Contra affair talked about his experience. Thanks to the loss of credibility caused by such revelation, Reagan wasn't able to continue his illegal campaign against Nicaragua. This saved many lives because the Contras, most of whose top commanders formerly were in Somoza's National Guard, were known for killing many civilians in their regime change campaign. ICJ ruled that USA was violating Nicaragua's sovereignty. Anyway, the point of this post isn't talking about Nicaragua or Reagan's authoritarianism, but to give thanks to all the brave journalists in the world who, in the past and in the present, are uncovering crimes and lies in order to inform everybody about reality.
To this day critical journalism and war journalism are dangerous jobs that are extremely important for a well-functioning society where people can be informed. Last year, according to UNESCO, 86 journalists were killed, with half targeted off duty. The deadliest individual countries were Mexico (19 killings), Ukraine (10) and Haiti (9). They also say "the rate of impunity for journalist killings remains shockingly high at 86%, creating a chilling effect for the work of journalists and risking freedom of expression worldwide ".
I wanted to comment about one specific case that has got extremely few press coverage in English: the independent Spanish journalist Pablo González (also Russian because he's the descendant of Spanish Civil War refugee kids who fled to the USSR), currently being held in pre-trial detention in Poland since Feb. 28 2022 with unproven spy accusations. Not even his lawyers have access to the alleged evidence. Thanks to my native language Spanish I can know a lot about the case in left-wing Spanish media, but I've been looking for decent articles in English and there are none, so I wanted to visibilise it here. The two VOA articles about him are too incomplete in my opinion and they understate how grave this press freedom violation is. Until recently he's been in solitary confinement and he hasn't been able to talk to his kids, only once has his wife been able to visit him. Not until this February, one year into the detention, has his lawyer been authorised to defend him (and he hasn't been given much, so Pablo's right to defense is being trampled on). The consul visits him every now and then, but he can't do much. Overall, his prison conditions are depressing.
In the name of all the good that journalism can do to the world, it's important to spread the message that Pablo González needs to be freed right now, that if they really think he's a spy that he be judged fairly and the obvious truth is upheld in the verdict. There's been a lot of coverage about the illegal detention of Evan Gershkovich in Russia, but almost nothing has been said about this journalist imprisoned in the EU, his wife Oihana Goiriena denounces. She says Spain's Foreign Affairs minister has asked for Gershkovich's freedom, but not even the freedom of a journalist of his own country, what a piece of shit. This is devastating for press freedom, don't hesitate to denounce it.
https://nuevarevolucion.es/oihana-goiriena-al-contrario-de-lo-que-dicen-los-ministros-rau-y-albares-el-derecho-a-la-defensa-de-pablo-gonzalez-no-esta-siendo-garantizado-para-nada/
<-- this is an interview with Oihana Goiriena in Spanish, click translate. I've seen that in this media one of the last reports by Pablo González, together with his colleague Juan Teixeira, was published in Jan. 27th 2022, it talked about the terribly difficult life of civilians who lived right next to the Donbass frontline.

Today I watched a new Vice News mini-documentary where the photojournalist that uncovered the Iran-Contra affair talked about his experience. Thanks to the loss of credibility caused by such revelation, Reagan wasn't able to continue his illegal campaign against Nicaragua. This saved many lives because the Contras, most of whose top commanders formerly were in Somoza's National Guard, were known for killing many civilians in their regime change campaign. ICJ ruled that USA was violating Nicaragua's sovereignty, revealing how authoritarian Reagan was, something that was already well known. Anyway, the point of this post isn't talking about Nicaragua or Reagan, but to give thanks to all the brave journalists in the world who, in the past and in the present, are uncovering crimes and lies in order to inform everybody about reality.
To this day critical journalism and war journalism are dangerous jobs that are extremely important for a well-functioning society where people can be informed. Last year, according to UNESCO, 86 journalists were killed, with half targeted off duty. The deadliest individual countries were Mexico (19 killings), Ukraine (10) and Haiti (9). They also say "the rate of impunity for journalist killings remains shockingly high at 86%, creating a chilling effect for the work of journalists and risking freedom of expression worldwide ".
I wanted to comment about one specific case that has got extremely few press coverage in English: the Spanish independent journalist Pablo González (also Russian because he's the descendant of Spanish Civil War refugees who fled to the USSR), currently being held in pre-trial detention in Poland since Feb. 28 2022 with unproven spy accusations. Not even his lawyers have access to the alleged evidence. I know a lot about the case because I'm a Spaniard, but I've been looking for decent articles in English and there are none, so I wanted to visibilise it here. The two VOA articles about him are too incomplete in my opinion and they understate how grave this press freedom violation is. Until recently he's been in solitary confinement and he hasn't been able to talk to his kids, only once has his wife been able to visit him. Not until this February, one year into the detention, has his lawyer been authorised to defend him (and he hasn't been given much, so Pablo's right to defense is being trampled on). The consul visits him every now and then, but he can't do much. Overall, his prison conditions are depressing.
In the name of all the good that journalism can do to the world, it's important to spread the message that Pablo González needs to be freed right now, that if they really think he's a spy that he be judged fairly and the obvious truth is upheld in the verdict. There's been a lot of coverage about the illegal detention of Evan Gershkovich in Russia, but almost nothing has been said about this journalist imprisoned in the EU, his wife Oihana Goiriena denounces. She says my country's Foreign Affairs minister has asked for Gershkovich's freedom, but not even the freedom of a journalist of his own country, what a piece of shit. This is devastating for press freedom, don't hesitate to denounce it.
https://nuevarevolucion.es/oihana-goiriena-al-contrario-de-lo-que-dicen-los-ministros-rau-y-albares-el-derecho-a-la-defensa-de-pablo-gonzalez-no-esta-siendo-garantizado-para-nada/ <-- this is an interview with Oihana Goiriena in Spanish, click translate. In this media one of the last reports by Pablo González, together with his colleague Juan Teixeira, was published in Jan. 27th 2022, it talked about the terribly difficult life of civilians who lived right next to the Donbass frontline.

Superando obstáculos juntos
Parte 1: Un giro inesperado tras la pérdida
Nuestra relación de 10 años ha pasado por altibajos, pero en general, éramos un matrimonio tranquilo que no tenía problemas con la familia. Sin embargo, hace tres años, sufrimos un duro golpe cuando la madre de mi suegro falleció. Esta tragedia afectó especialmente a mi cuñado y marcó el comienzo de un período difícil en nuestras vidas.
Después de unos meses, mi cuñado comenzó a salir con una chica que poco a poco se fue quedando en la casa de mis suegros. Sin embargo, tuvimos un incidente que puso en peligro la integridad de mi hija. Como madre, reaccioné rápidamente para evitar que las cosas empeoraran, pero mi suegra no pareció preocuparse. Para mi sorpresa, cada vez daban más prioridad a la chica en lugar de a nosotros, y su verdadera personalidad comenzó a mostrarse. Era de esas personas que lloraban y actuaban como torpes para evitar ser reprendidas, y mi relación con ella se volvió tensa.
Mi esposo y yo decidimos tomar distancia de esa mujer, pero eso no fue suficiente. Un día, ella fue a llorarle a mis suegros y trataron de obligarnos a convivir con ella. Ante su insistencia, mi esposo habló con su madre, lo cual no estuve de acuerdo, y eso solo empeoró las cosas. En medio de la discusión, mi suegro incluso dijo que éramos "problema de viejas sin quehacer". Mi enojo fue tan grande que preferí alejarme de ellos por un tiempo. Pero las cosas no mejoraron.
Parte 2: El distanciamiento y los eventos familiares
Mi cuñado decidió casarse con la chica sin siquiera informar a su hermano. Nos enteramos de la boda a través de otros familiares y ni siquiera fuimos invitados a la pedida de mano, a pesar de que todos los demás asistieron. Por motivos laborales, me tuve que mudar a otra ciudad, dejando a mi esposo e hija atrás, pensando que la distancia ayudaría a calmar la situación. Sin embargo, no fue así.
Dentro de la familia, empezaron a tacharme de la "mala" sin siquiera saber lo que realmente sucedía. Mi esposo vivía a solo cinco minutos a pie de distancia, pero su hermano se negaba a dirigirle la palabra. Mi suegra hablaba con él acerca de los eventos de la boda, pidiéndole que perdonara, pero siempre estaban ocupados. Incluso cuando mi esposo planeaba visitarme, su madre le llamaba diciéndole que regresara porque al día siguiente había un evento importante relacionado con la boda. Parecía que nuestra presencia no era deseada y que éramos ignorados.
Mi suegra incluso se tomó la libertad de comprar vestidos y coronas para mi hija sin consultarnos, asumiendo que sería una paje en la boda. Cuando llegó el momento de la ceremonia, no teníamos una invitación formal. Decidimos que no asistiríamos si no éramos requeridos. Mi suegra intentó justificarlo diciendo que si ya sabíamos, podríamos haber llegado sin invitación. Dos días antes del evento, su hermano llamó a mi esposo a las 11 de la noche para entregarle la invitación. Él se negó y le dijo que iría porque su madre así lo quería. Mi hija y yo no asistimos. Luego, escuché que ella decía que le tenía envidia y que la casa de mis suegros solo le pertenecía a ella por ser la "auténtica" nuera. También comentaba que lloraba porque no había visto a mi hija.
Parte 3: Manteniendo distancia y tomando decisiones difíciles
Después de ese incidente, me alejé aún más de la familia de mi esposo. Era difícil decirle a mi esposo que su propia familia le causaba dolor, pero después de unos meses, él insistió en que nos fuéramos de vacaciones con ellos. Pensé que las cosas mejorarían, pero no fue así. A pocos días de nuestro viaje, la esposa de mi cuñado le envió un mensaje a mi esposo, alegando que yo estaba difamando a la familia al decir que nos habían corrido de la casa en tres ocasiones diferentes. Negué rotundamente sus acusaciones, sabiendo que estaban llenas de mentiras e hipocresía.
A pesar de las provocaciones, decidí evitar que la situación empeorara, ya que ella estaba embarazada y no quería que su bebé sufriera las consecuencias. Sin embargo, me negué a ayudar a mi esposo en ese asunto, ya que conocía la verdad. Mi cuñado, influenciado por su esposa y su estado, aceptó su versión de los hechos. Tuvimos que hablar con mis suegros y dejar en claro que estábamos hartos de todo. Inicialmente, ellos pensaron que yo era la problemática, pero finalmente mi suegra habló con su hijo.
Aunque la situación sigue siendo complicada, la chica finalmente dio a luz y está ocupada con su nueva vida familiar. Sin embargo, mis suegros continúan sin responder las llamadas de mi esposo y se hacen las víctimas, afirmando que nosotros no los visitamos. Me siento frustrada y mi paciencia se está agotando. No sé cómo hacer que mi esposo entienda que su familia no lo valora ni lo toma en cuenta. Mi nivel de tolerancia está alcanzando su límite.

Estamos buscando ciudad para vivir mi novia y yo.
Actualmente estamos viviendo en mty pero conocemos la cdmx y nos gusta mucho.
Estamos indeciso en cual decidir por eso acudo a ustedes sabios anonimos del internet para pedirles unos comentarios de sabiduria y elegir en que ciudad vivir.
​
edit: la lana pa' la renta no importa ya que ambos somos quant devs trabajando para una firma en new york.

Hola a todos.
Como estamos en el mes del padre, les traigo un top 10 sobre los mejores padres que han salido en series televisivas o de internet.
Todos estos personajes son la viva imagen de la paternidad sana y afectuosa y se tiene muy merecido ser celebrados en su día.
Sin más demora, comencemos.

10. Martin Crane de ''Frasier''

El padre de Frasier y Niles era el contrapunto perfecto ante la erudicción de sus hijos.

9. Bill de ''One Mississippi''

El retrato que Tig Notaro hace de su padrastro (interpretado por John Rothman) en '' One Misisipi'' es el de una persona obsesionada por el buen hacer y la gestión de la casa y con el que aparentemente no les unía nada más allá que el amor a su madre. Pero pese a las diferencias, es un hombre con un corazón sobrehumano.

8. Burt Hummel de ''Glee''

Una preciosa relación paternofilial entre él y Kurt . A pesar de que le hubiera gustado que fuera de otra manera, Burt muestra todo su apoyo para que su hijo persiga sus sueños artísticos.

7. Sandy Cohen de ''The OC''

Otro padrazo de las series de ficción es Sandy Cohen, uno de los protagonistas de ''The OC''. Peter Gallagher da vida a un abogado idealista especializado en menores conflictivos y durante la serie es lo que podríamos llamar la brújula moral de los Cohen y compañía.

6. Jack Pearson DE ''This is us''

Un padre de familia con un corazón tan grande que no dudo adoptar a un niño abandonado y por la excelente crianza que le dio a todos sus hijos.

5. Philip Banks de ''El principe de Bel-Air''

Tal vez no sea el padre de Will, pero claramente es el mejor ejemplo a seguir que puede tener el joven, y desempeño su papel como figura paterna de Will (quien por cierto no tiene padre) que es una de las personas en las que más confía el príncipe del rap.

4. Tony Soprano de ''Los Soprano''

James Gandolfini interpretó a Tony, un pequeño capo que durante 6 temporadas estuvo buscando, a veces sin encontrarlo, el equilibrio entre la familia carnal y la criminal.

3. Mike Heck de ''The Middle''

Mike entra en ese arquetipo del hombre medio, obrero y tranquilo pero que su aparente calma ante las situaciones familiares le llevan a ser un gran pilar en la serie.

2. Bob Tanner de ''Padres Forzosos''

Ser padre ya es una tarea complicada, pero imagínense convertirse repentinamente en un padre soltero con 3 hijos pequeños. Por suerte Bob demostró que tiene la forma de lograr lo que se proponga y criar con éxito a sus tres pequeños.

1. Phil Dunphy de ''Modern Family''

Phil es un hombre que a logrado compaginar la paternidad con su carrera, y día a día se esfuerza en ser alguien mejor para su familia.
Pero, ¿Quiero qué piensan?
¿Me falto mencionar a alguien?
Por favor déjenlo en los comentarios y recuerden darle un voto a favor a este post.
Muchas gracias😊😊😊😊😊😊.

Some father
Id: 78 Category: Logos Date: 2023-06-07 22:46:00
​
Influence or confluence of thought, according to the God of the fathers.
...
God is the God of some father.
*****************************************
​
Algún padre
Id: 78 Category: Logos Date: 2023-06-07 22:46:00
​
Influencia de pensamiento, o confluencia de pensamienton de acuerdo al Dios de los padres…
Dios es el Dios de algún padre.

Sucede que me dijo que no sabía que sentía por mí, así que le propuse seguir siendo novios, mientras la intento enamorar dr nuevo

La terapeuta decía ser especialista en el trauma, y otros temas relacionados. Parecía una persona "segura".
La experiencia fue terrible. Me maltrato en reacción a que yo intentara revelar diferentes clases de maltrato que viví y estaba viviendo al hablar con ella, de diferentes grados de seriedad. Empecé a decir de más, en vez de huir y rápido. Termine hablándole de cosas super delicadas, tratando de obligarla a tomarme en serio. Solo fue así de grave el daño. No se me olvida. ¿Yo para qué necesito más de eso?
Por la educación que sí tenía, solía defenderse aventándome clichés. Actuaba de una manera, y se defendía actuando la actitud opuesta, la correcta, y empática. Podía actuar incrédula y dentro de unos momentos decirme, “No estás loca”. Se sintió un acto. El hacer una cosa y declararte la última capaz de hacerlo.
Me cuestioné por mucho tiempo sobre si de verdad me trato mal o yo la malinterprete. Hace poco estuvieron los noticieros hablando sobre el caso de Héctor Parra. Pude ver en tiempo real a toda una masa de gente llamarle a su hija, Alexa, mentirosa, ingenua, malvada, sociopatía, maquiavélica. Todo “en protección de la familia”. Y frecuentemente hablando de una eventual retribución divina -- dios castiga. Todo un mundo en contra de ella y una persona entre mil hablando de su propia experiencia también siendo víctima.
Viví esta clase de trato de parte de la terapeuta que vi. Intente encontrar a otra persona, fui con varias otras, pero vi que lo que predomina es esa clase de actitud. Es cuestión de poder. Esta clase de gente hace daño, pero esta protegida por la predominancia de “valores” conservadores donde vivo.
No estoy en contra de la terapia, pero se debe reconocer que este tipo de cosas sí suceden.

Background
Canary Islands is a Spanish archipelago of volcanic nature located in the eastern Atlantic ocean, just west of southern Morocco. The chain of islands extends for approximately 490 kilometers (300 miles).
Canary Islands is both geologically and climatologically almost identical to Hawaii, and as such, international tourism has been the main pillar of its economy since the 1960s.
The Event
At around 10:15 PM of June 22nd, 1976, emergency services in all the main seven islands received a flood of calls, with people reporting having seen a strange and frightening phenomenon taking place in the night sky. Most of these callers described what they were seeing as 'a gigantic explosion of light' or 'a massive ball of fire', and all of them said the phenomenon seemed to be taking place somewhere far in the west. These accounts were quickly confirmed true by local authorities, since the 'explosion of light' in question shone for several minutes before dissipating.
Many witnesses also added having seen one or two much smaller red lights moving strangely before the 'explosion' took place -rising from the horizon or from behind the mountains at very high speed, although others added that the lights flew following 'a zig-zag trajectory'.
No sound was heard or reported regarding the phenomenon, and no consequences seemed to follow except for a frightened population.
A foreign tourist vacationing in the island of Gran Canaria took the only known legit picture available of the phenomenon, from the balcony of his hotel room in Maspalomas. Here you can see a bigger version of the picture with enhanced contrast.
Here's a drawing extracted from an official report made by the Spanish Air Force. The drawing depicts a description of the event made with the information gathered from witnesses reports in the western coast of Gran Canaria. The mountains in the drawing are a depiction of the silhouette of Tenerife, the island immediately west of Gran Canaria. In order to understand the extreme magnitude of the 'explosion of light', please take into account that Tenerife is 70 kilometers (44 miles) away and its tallest peak -Mount Teide, which is in fact Spain's tallest mountain- is 3,718 meters tall (12,198 feet). Here's a real picture of the landscape depicted in the drawing, for a better perspective.
Hong Kong's bulk carrier vessel Osaka Bay was sailing from Capetown (South Africa) to Southampton (United Kingdom). The event took place when she was some 400 kilometers (250 miles) south of the island of La Gomera, and her crew did also witness the phenomenon. Here's a drawing made out of their witness reports.
The crew of the Spanish Navy's corvette Atrevida (F-61) observed the phenomenon as she was sailing just south of the island of Fuerteventura. Her captain's account of the event;
"At 22:27 local time of June 22nd it was seen, for the first time, a bright light of an intense bluish yellow color, taking off and rising in altitude towards our position... Once it reached certain height (15º-18º) it stood still, turning its light projection and showing its light source. It remained like that for approximately two minutes, before bursting into a large circle of bright bluish yellow light that remained in that position for forty minutes even after the original preceding phenomenon had faded away.
Two minutes later the light source split, its lower half being smaller and standing in the middle of the circle of light, turning into a bluish cloud as the split half that had originated this bluish mass faded away. The upper half gained altitude while describing a fast but irregular spiraling trajectory, vanishing afterwards. None of these movements had any effect whatsoever on the initial circle of light, whose features remained the same, partially illuminating land and sea, which leads to believe that it wasn't an object far in the distance, but rather close".
Here's the translation of local newspaper excerpts detailing the event;
"It was spotted between 10:15 and 10:30 PM and, according to one of our journalists who has his residence at Valle de Aridane (La Palma island), at that time he observed something that looked like a rocket emerging from the sea and flying towards El Time peak shining with an intense red light. The same phenomenon was spotted in Tazacorte (in La Palma island too). The ferry Villa de Agaete, sailing from Las Palmas, could observe a great shining at exactly 10:20 PM, shortly before docking in Santa Cruz de Tenerife. The shining, which lasted about five minutes, appeared like a rocket that had come out of the sea". - El Día (June 23rd, 1976)
"Last night, at around half past ten, a strange object was spotted from several points of our region, especially in the areas of Gáldar and Telde (Gran Canaria), where most phone calls we received in that regard were from. Our callers explained to us that it was a round object that grew massively in size as it rose, clearly defined before it began to fade.
The aforementioned phenomenon began as a couple of red objects that moved in zig-zag, forming into some sort of spiral whose lower half ended in three clearly differentiated but overlaying stripes with some degree of separation between them. They were of a very bright red color and faded gradually. On top of these stripes there was what looked like two powerful blue focal lights, which began to diminish in intensity too before turning into a thin haze afterwards". - La Provincia (June 23rd, 1976)
​
Thanks to these accounts and description of the events, calculations could be made in order to ascertain the phenomenon's origins. At the moment of its beginning (which many witnesses described as a rocket taking off) the sun was already 13.7º under the horizon and its azimuth angle was 307º (northwest). Setting a hypothetical POV in the geographical center of the archipelago (28.50º N, 15.75º W, just north of Gran Canaria, it was calculated that during it's first phase (the 'rocket lights') the phenomenon was located some 762 kilometers (473 miles) straight west, at an approximate altitude of 46 kilometers (28 miles). By the end of its final phase (the 'explosion of light') it had traveled to a point located at around 1,062 kilometers (662 miles) west and had risen to a final altitude of 90 kilometers (56 miles).
These calculations became a very important piece of data, we'll get back to them later.
​
The UFO/Aliens narrative (AKA the press cherry-picks the statement of one particularly imaginative witness in order to sell a story of very questionable credibility)
Being the 1970s, almost immediately certain sectors of the press began talking about UFO -and subsequently about aliens, even though there was no further evidence to suggest such thing. The local authorities (the Army especially) focused their efforts into reassuring the population that there was nothing to fear, while at the same time gathering all the information they could gather in order to investigate the phenomenon.
In June of 1994, exactly eighteen years after that night, the Spanish Army declassified the 107-pages long investigation report of what by then it had been baptized as the "OVNI de Canarias 22/06/1976" ("Canary Islands' 06/22/1976 UFO"). Back then very few people in Spain had internet access, and as such the release of these documents went unnoticed for most people. However, many journalists rushed to get a copy of the report, and many of these worked for UFO/paranormal magazines of dubious scientific accuracy. And, aware of the kind of reaction they wanted to generate from the public they target, they focused in just one part of the report; Dr. Padrón's story.
Francisco Julio Padrón León (who passed away in 2013) was a general practitioner that lived and had his office in the rural municipality of Gáldar, which is located precisely in the northwestern part of the island of Gran Canaria (and precisely, where a lot of people reported witnessing the phenomenon. Unlike most witnessed, however, Padrón told Spanish authorities a much more extravagant version of the events.
That night he had been called in person to check on a local patient at her home, and the doctor had called a taxi in order to reach the patient's residence; Padrón lived in the town of Guía, and the patient lived at a small parish some 10 kilometers away (6 miles) named Las Rosas. Padrón, his companion and the taxi driver claimed having observed the phenomenon when the car was covering the last two kilometers of the route (at that point, a very narrow and barely paved rural road). Or more specifically, Padrón and the taxi driver claimed having bumped into it; because, according to the statement, at that moment the car's headlights illuminated a sphere that was floating right in front of them. The Padrón and the taxi driver described it as measuring some 30 meters (98 feet), slightly bright and slightly translucent. They (the doctor, especially) described seeing two humanoid entities inside the sphere, surrounded by what looked to be inner aluminum structural parts of the sphere. These figures were, per their statements, between 2.5 and 3 meters tall (8'2" to 9'10"), one taller than the other, and they were dressed in red skin-tight suits. Padrón claimed that these beings stood facing each other, apparently interacting among them but didn't seem to notice his or the taxi driver's presence. It then began to grow in size until (his words) "becoming as big as a 20-story building" and began ascending. At this point of his statement he said he went to check on her patient, after which he told all people present at the patients' home, inviting everyone to go outside and check by themselves what he claimed he had seen. By the time everyone joined Dr. Padrón to watch, the sphere was already very big, standing high in the sky and then it flew away at extreme speed ("faster than any aircraft I've seen in my life", Padrón said in the report) leaving a trail of blue smoke behind before vanishing in the distance, towards Tenerife island.
In his individual report, the taxi driver made just a very skimp corroboration of Padrón's statement, omitting most details of his version of the phenomenon. It was just a few sentences long. The taxi driver was a man in his sixties (and wore glasses) of very little formal education -in fact, his preliminary handwritten statement had to be redacted to correct numerous grammar and spelling mistakes.
As for the companion (a relative of the patient, who was traveling in the backseat), this man only describes seeing "intense bright light everywhere" and noticing "both the doctor and the taxi driver's agitation". He claimed the amount of light, plus the fact that by sitting in the backseat the taxi driver and the doctor's bodies blocked his view, hadn't allowed him to see what Padrón claimed having witnessed.
The declassified document contained many more witness reports gathered from the same area, but none of them matched Dr. Padrón's story about a sphere with two humanoids figures in it; every other description -most of them provided by locals- mentions the same enormous disc of light in the west night sky. A car mechanic and his wife described it as "a car's headlight thrice as large as the full moon". A school teacher mentioned having seen it from his house's window through a pair of binoculars when it began to fade, noticing its "fog-like appearance, and the night stars could be seen through", and mentioning what looked like a couple of bluish beams inside. A farmer explained in his statement that it looked like "a fire spot", he too mentioned seeing "two blue lines" in it. Not even the sick woman Padrón had come to provide medical attention to nor her relatives confirmed the Dr.'s description of the phenomenon, matching instead everyone else's.
That didn't stop the journalists working for UFO/paranormal-themed magazines or even some journalists working for reputable newspapers from disregarding all these credible witnesses and instead focusing on the most outlandish one; Dr. Padrón. In summer of 1994, several of these Spanish magazines like Enigmas, Año Cero or Más Allá rushed to publish a drawing depicting Padrón's description of the 'humanoid figures dressed in red' in their articles, not only making absolutely no mention of any of the other witnesses but also claimed that the propulsion system of the alleged 'alien spacecraft' had scorched a nearby onion field -the area is full of that type of crops- and that posterior chemical analysis of the scorched terrain had yielded wildly unusual results. We'll come back to this point later.
Sketch depicting Padrón's (unique, literally) description of the event. Yes, someone from the Army - more specifically from the Air Force- was tasked with sitting down next to this guy and spending a good deal of time drawing whatever ludicrous thing Padrón felt like coming up with.
Something worth mentioning; these publications made heavy emphasis on Padrón's education -he was a GP, after all. As in, as extraordinary as his claims were, these were being made by a man of a high level of education, intelligent and therefore (in the eyes of many) automatically worth of credibility. In fact, the patient's relative traveling in the taxi's backseat -a farmhand that had never received formal schooling and was illiterate- said in his witness report that one of the reasons why he did not question Padrón's statement was precisely the abysmal difference in education between him and the doctor, and kind of assumed that if an educated man like Padrón said that such thing had indeed happened, then it must have been true.
A local newspaper interviewed Dr. Padrón shortly after the documents were declassified. And by then, eighteen years after that night, Padrón added some more details to his already bizarre account, providing these journalists with something that wouldn't have been out of place in an episode of The X-Files (which back in 1994 had begun to be broadcasted in Spain, with significant success). Back in 1976 Padrón had already added in his statement that he did not feel fear but 'a strange sense of wellbeing and excitement' in his encounter with the alleged spacecraft; now he was also saying that these beings -which never communicated with him in any way, per his account- had not only the ability to erase anyone's memories off their brains, but they also can "make you see whatever they want you to do for months or years, replacing an 'energy' [his word] in your brain". If these statements weren't absurd enough, Dr. Padrón warned the journalists about not taking him seriously, because in the last three years he "had observed that anyone who had been skeptical of my statements and hurt my credibility in public has passed away within six or seven months, all of them to cancer, eight people in total so far".
Although the documents that included the description of his ludicrous story hadn't been declassified until 1994, ever since 1976 many journalists had managed to get in touch with Padrón and hear his story -the doctor himself wasn't exactly quiet about it either -and some of these are allegedly the cancer victims Padrón would've been referring to. There's no way to check the veracity of that, since the only source of that statement was Padrón himself.
Between 1976 and 1994 the doctor's story circulated in a somewhat obscure manner, being referred to in some UFO articles here and there -and adding their own artistic depictions of his outlandish story. Padrón was already telling any 'paranormal' journalist willing to listen about the scorched onion field. Turned out, back in June of 1976 a farmer in the municipality of Guía did indeed notice an area in one of his onion crops that seemed to have been burned, but that man had specified that that hadn't happened until the morning of June 24th, a good day and half after Padrón's alleged 'alien encounter'. What is more, although the cause of these burns couldn't be ascertained, they were indistinguishable from fire damage. To this day it's thought that these burnt onion plants were nothing but the result of vandalism or a prank. Some UFO skepticism authors have raised the possibility of the doctor himself being responsible.
Picture of one of the many onion fields in Guía and Gáldar. To this day, Dr. Padrón's 'scorched onion field' remains a running joke among the older residents in these municipalities.
At the time Padrón even managed, out of sheer insistence, to get that soil tested. Surprisingly to no one, all chemical, physical and radiological analyses performed yielded no unusual results. The sampling and testing was conducted by Hungarian-Spanish physician Alejandro Carlos de Gyorko-Gyorkos, who at the time was curious about paranormal phenomena and had interviewed Padrón many times in 1976. According to a journalist for Naukas (A Spanish online science and technology magazine that specializes in skepticism and debunking of pseudoscience), in 1992 Gyorko-Gyorkos described Padrón as a man that "interprets everything he comes up with as real". By 1994 Padrón was also claiming that the Spanish Air Force had threatened him with legal action to silence him, and that Gyorko-Gyorkos was a man whose "ethics he'd rather not talk about". Padrón had never mentioned these alleged legal threats at any point before June of that year, precisely once the documents were declassified, a coincidence that hadn't gone unnoticed.
Some skepticism authors have elucubrated about the possible inspiration for Padrón's 'tall men in dressed in red spacesuits'. Not exactly very original.
​
​
Explanation (1994 and 2001)
The 1976 document concludes that the origen of the 22/06/976 UFO -although in reality the Spanish Air force used then the acronym FANI (Fenómeno Aéreo No Identificado', 'Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon') when referring to it- was unknown. In 1994 these paranormal journalists presented such conclusion as an automatic evidence of aliens, or at least UFOs in the sense popular culture depicts then. In reality, as anyone can notice upon checking the report, 'unknown' means precisely that; unknown. At no point in the report the authors bring up rebuttals for any possible logical or rational explanation, but rather they conclude that back in 1976 there was just not enough evidence to provide an accurate explanation of its origin.
The same report contains the transcription of precisely Dr. Gyorko-Gyorkos's opinion about Dr. Padrón's reasoning (safe to assume, by then had already made up his mind about the man) in a military court. In the transcription, and in what looks like a generous maneuver to dismiss Padrón's claims without going as far to humiliate him, Gyorko-Gyorkos explains a military judge that that night Dr. Padrón, possibly overworked and sleep-deprived, misremembered what had seen and his fatigued psyche had create a mixed recollection with what he had seen and what had crossed his mind. As for the taxi driver, this man was probably highly impressionable -apparently the Dr. had behaved in a very excited manner during the phenomenon- and thus in a way Padrón had 'passed' his delusional belief onto him. The military court ruled that "Padrón's credibility could not, for the time being, be corroborated".
Of course, at this point of this writeup a question still lingers; what was whatever thing close to a million and half people saw in the night sky back on June 22nd, 1976? First, let's go over the world's state of affairs at the time, because this is one of these 'mysteries' in which history had been hinting at the answer almost from the beginning;
In 1976 the world was still amidst of a low-key conflict between two superpowers with lots of political tensions; the United States (plus NATO) versus the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (plus other members of the Warsaw Pact). AKA, Cold War. As part of the Western Bloc, at the time Spain had been a long-time ally of NATO. However, the country wouldn't become a NATO member itself until 1982 -which was so controversial within Spain that a referendum would be held in 1986 questioning Spanish people's desire to remain in the military alliance.
As such, while Spain was a Western ally, back in 1976 it was not really 'in the game' yet, especially when taking into account that, unlike in other countries, NATO membership wasn't that welcome. Please notice the year the Spanish army declassified the documents; 1994. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 (and with it , the fall of the Iron Curtain) helped lower the stakes this international poker game, and as such the world would learn about all sorts of crazy things that had been going on at both sides of the conflict in absolute secrecy.
Earlier in this writeup there is a data-based description of the phenomenon's behavior, but most importantly, it's ballistic trajectory. Adding to that, countless witnesses had described seeing either one or a couple of lights 'taking off like a rocket'. Let's remember; it had been ascertained that it originated at about 700 kilometers west and had moved further west in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean while reaching an altitude of 90 kilometers -which is about the lower thermosphere. This had already raised the first suspicions among the members of the Spanish intelligence services, suspicions that gained weight in 1994 -and that likely led to the declassification of the report- when much clearer and straightforward communication between the United States' government and Spain's allowed for a more open investigation of the sort of testing the Americans were engaging in. In 2001 an article of research journalism, coauthored by science journalists Ricardo Campo and Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos finally identified what was behind the 1976 aerial phenomenon.
Campo and Ballester had already noticed its ballistic trajectory calculated in 1976. In 1999, suspecting already who (country) was the 'culprit', they accessed Jonathan McDowell's database of ballistic missile launches. Previous to that Campo and Ballester had failed to find any useful information in NASA's archives, as none of the launches in their registry matched the evidence, and prior to that -right after the 1994 declassification, in fact- they had traveled to Moscow looking for the possible explanation there. Russian military authorities had adamantly denied their involvement in the phenomena, which directed the investigators towards other leads (while at the same time not disregarding the possibility of Russia being behind it after all.
Finally, Campo and Ballester bumped into these two rows of the database. First column indicates the launch identification number. Second and third, the date (in the Julian and Gregorian calendars. Fourth is GMT time (which, adjusting for a compilation error, coincides with Canary Islands' GMT+1 local time when the phenomenon took place). The fifth column tells the type of missile, the sixth on identifies the launch platform and finally the seventh one indicates who was responsible for the launch.
Simply put, the information in these rows means; on June 22nd, 1976, two Poseidon C3 thermonuclear missiles were launched from US Navy's submarine USS Von Steuben), at 20:16 and 20:17 GTM.
The database does not include location (that information remains classified) but during their research Campo and Ballester learned from McDowell himself that the US Navy's eastern test range covers from Cape Canaveral (Florida, US) all the way Ascension Island. The location of the 1976's phenomenon falls well within such range.
From here, Campos and Ballester offered an explanation of its optics. The Poseidon C3 missile carries several 40-kiloton nuclear warheads (normally ten) -for comparison, Little Boy was a single 15-kiloton bomb. Once the two 400-kiloton missiles detonated in the thermosphere, the quick expansion of extremely hot atmospheric gases reflected the sunlight back to Earth, even though by then in Canary Islands the sun was already well below the horizon and the sky was pitch black; at 90 kilometers of altitude, these expanding gases were still in direct path of the sunlight. This reflection is what made the phenomenon appear so bright and big in spite of the 700+ kilometers of distance between witnesses and its source.
Campo and Ballester's article provided also an explanation for other similar events -albeit not that espectacular as the one pertaining this writeup- that had taken place in the islands between 1973 and 1979. All except one were found to be the result of other American thermonuclear tests, with the exception of this one seen south of the archipelago in 1979 -and finally acknowledged by Russia in 2017, although they did not explain what exactly it was.
Conclusion
TL;DR: It was a couple of thermonuclear missiles launched in secrecy by the US Navy in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. The 'aliens' witness was, to put it mildy, an individual with an extreme tendency to make ludicrous statements and a marked need to be the centre of attention.
​
Campo and Ballester's work is available online for free, and anyone who speak Spanish can check the story of their investigation for themselves.
This is not to say that the whole 'aliens' narrative died down. To this day, the story of the 1976 phenomenon continues to be shared sometimes in media as 'proof' of UFO/aliens, even though it's literally neither -coincidentally, failing to mention the vast amount of evidence pointing at a thermonuclear test. In June of 2016 several newspapers published articles remembering the phenomenon in its 40th anniversary, and pretty much all of them reminded the reader right from the headline that the 'mystery' had long been solved.
Links and Sources
"Two red giants riding a missile" - Excellent article in the aforementioned online magazine Naukas written by Ricardo Campo himself on the phenomenon (Spanish)
The Spanish Army's declassified document on the event. It can be downloaded for free as a 107-pages long PDF
2016 Article (Spanish)

Royals @ Marlins - Wed, Jun 07

Game Status: In Progress - Score: 3-1 Marlins

Bottom of the 5th, 1 out, bases empty, 0-0 count with Jordan Lyles pitching and Luis Arraez batting. Bryan De La Cruz is on deck, and Jesus Sanchez is in the hole.

Links & Info

• Current conditions at loanDepot park: 72°F - Roof Closed - Wind 0 mph, None
• TV: Royals: Bally Sports Kansas City, Marlins: Bally Sports Florida
• Radio: Royals: KCSP 610, Marlins: WAQI 710 (es), FOX Sports 940AM (WINZ)
• MLB Gameday
• Game Graphs
• Savant Gamefeed

	Royals Batters	AB	R	H	RBI	BB	K	LOB	AVG	OBP	SLG
1	Pratto - LF	2	0	1	1	0	1	0	.302	.393	.468
2	Pasquantino - 1B	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	.248	.327	.438
3	Perez, S - C	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	.276	.313	.502
4	Melendez - RF	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	.221	.309	.373
5	Witt Jr. - SS	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	.235	.269	.418
6	Lopez, N - 2B	2	0	0	0	0	1	0	.224	.344	.316
7	Massey - DH	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	.228	.285	.327
8	Garcia, M - 3B	2	1	1	0	0	0	1	.255	.321	.367
9	Bradley Jr. - CF	2	0	0	0	0	1	1	.133	.188	.210
	Totals	15	1	2	1	2	4	5

Royals
BATTING: TB: Garcia, M; Pratto. RBI: Pratto (16). Team RISP: 1-for-1. Team LOB: 2. GIDP: Garcia, M.

	Marlins Batters	AB	R	H	RBI	BB	K	LOB	AVG	OBP	SLG
1	Arraez - 2B	2	1	1	0	0	0	0	.402	.451	.495
2	De La Cruz - DH	2	0	0	0	0	1	2	.297	.350	.462
3	Sánchez, J - RF	2	1	2	3	0	0	0	.302	.374	.583
4	Gurriel - 1B	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	.279	.337	.422
5	Wendle - SS	2	0	1	0	0	0	0	.257	.329	.392
6	Segura - 3B	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	.191	.260	.219
7	Berti - LF	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	.269	.317	.345
8	Stallings - C	2	0	0	0	0	0	1	.157	.222	.213
9	Hampson - CF	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	.236	.306	.345
	Totals	17	3	4	3	1	1	6

Marlins
BATTING: HR: Sánchez, J (6, 3rd inning off Lyles, 2 on, 2 out). TB: Arraez; Sánchez, J 5; Wendle. RBI: Sánchez, J 3 (16). 2-out RBI: Sánchez, J 3. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Stallings. Team RISP: 1-for-3. Team LOB: 2.
FIELDING: DP: (Arraez-Gurriel).

Royals Pitchers	IP	H	R	ER	BB	K	HR	P-S	ERA
Lyles	4.1	4	3	3	1	1	1	56-37	6.85
Totals	4.1	4	3	3	1	1	1

Marlins Pitchers	IP	H	R	ER	BB	K	HR	P-S	ERA
Cabrera, E	5.0	2	1	1	2	4	0	65-38	4.29
Totals	5.0	2	1	1	2	4	0

Inning	Scoring Play	Score
Top 3	Nick Pratto singles on a line drive to left fielder Jon Berti. Maikel Garcia scores.	1-0 KC
Bottom 3	Jesus Sanchez homers (6) on a fly ball to center field. Garrett Hampson scores. Luis Arraez scores.	3-1 MIA

Team	Highlight
MIA	Bullpen availability for Miami, June 7 vs Royals (00:00:07)
KC	Bullpen availability for Kansas City, June 7 vs Marlins (00:00:07)
KC	Fielding alignment for Kansas City, June 7 vs Marlins (00:00:11)
MIA	Fielding alignment for Miami, June 7 vs Royals (00:00:11)
MIA	Starting lineups for Royals at Marlins - June 7, 2023 (00:00:09)
MIA	Analyzing Jesús Sánchez's home run through bat tracking (00:00:09)
MIA	Edward Cabrera K's Nick Pratto (00:00:06)
KC	Lyles strikes out Cruz swinging (00:00:07)
KC	Nick Pratto's RBI single (00:00:15)
MIA	Sánchez's three-run HR (6) (00:00:35)
MIA	Garrett Hampson's leaping catch (00:00:13)
MIA	Brent Brown talks Luis Arraez (00:02:05)

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9		R	H	E	LOB
Royals	0	0	1	0	0						1	2	0	2
Marlins	0	0	3	0							3	4	0	2

Division Scoreboard

MIN 0 @ TB 1 - Bottom 3, 1 Out
BOS 0 @ CLE 0 - Top 1, 1 Out
DET 0 @ PHI 0 - Postponed
CWS 0 @ NYY 0 - Postponed
^{Last Updated: 06/07/2023 06:16:40 PM CDT}

Lo amo a Leo, me parece que se merece hacer lo que se le canta el soberano orto porque ya le dio al fútbol más de lo que cualquier otra persona podría y aún asi me da bronca que se vaya al equipo que esta LITERALMENTE ÚLTIMO en la liga de mierda de la derecha del país que al fulbo lo llama soccer por tener la cabeza destruida de tanto rugby con pase adelante. Qué va a hacer futbolísticamente ahí? Ni siquiera ganar los torteos verga que se presenta siendo el único competitivo a lo PSG... Y todo bien con los que dicen "la MLS no es la camello cup" pero la diferencia entre patronato y almagro (con todo respeto a ambos equipos) es medio vacía para el mejor jugador de la historia. Sino dsp nos llenamos la boca diciendo que Pele nunca fue a europa al dope. Nada, solo catarsis. Aguante Leo, ojalá lo inviten al inter a la libertadores y la gané con 28 goles y 143 asistencias.