Gay grindr hookup porn

While looking for vintage gay magazines, I found a listing for a little boy on eBay. What do I do?
I wanted to decorate my apartment so I decided to look up vintage gay magazines to put on my walls. On eBay I’d search “gay vintage,” “gay photos,” etc and I came across a listing for a little boy.
He’s priced at $3,994 and listed as “gay porn.” On eBay! What’s scary is that the listing are screenshots of his mother’s Facebook profile. I saw her full name, so I immediately looked her up on Facebook. It’s definitely a real account, and her son looks to be safe and sound.
But this is freaking me the F out. This user doesn’t have any other listings, just this one. They’ve apparently sold nine other things, and they have 100% rating.
I reported the listing, but do I contact the mother? Or do I just ignore it completely? Do I write to the FBI or something? I’m terrified if after this auction ends this boy ends up missing.
What do I do?

I am suffering from confusion and mental exhaustion and often burst into tears even at my workplace, but I don’t know a way out. Now, I mustered up the courage to post it all here. I am using different names here for privacy. I (32f) am stuck in a situationship with Alex (48m). We’re in this situationship for 1.5 years.
I belong to a conservative society where dating/relationships or premarital sex is frowned upon, so I grew up keeping that in mind. I have had several crushes since 13 but never dared to tell anyone apart from my high school best friend. She encouraged me to date since she herself was doing but I was too scared and never acted upon my feelings. After high school, I suffered from severe mental illness called as dissociation disorder and I often had maniac episodes due to which I left studies and rejoined after an year. I had not so good relation with my parents especially my father so I bottled up my thoughts and feelings throughout my childhood and early teenage years and I burst out eventually. I am on medication since then.
Due to no interaction with boys, I was unaware of their intentions and I started a long distance relationship with an unknown guy on phone, eventually my parents found out and I came to know his real self which was not good at all. He was a habitual groomer. I was yet to touch 18 then. That story was over but I got to know about sexual desire and I started playing with myself though didn’t know much about it, after a year I started searching it out on internet and next year I found a porn video, from where I learned about clit stimulation and started doing it often. I was in my early twenties then. Then, a year later during my university’s freshman year, I had developed a crush on my classmate who then became my good friend. I was devastated when I found out he had a crush on my best friend. She encouraged me to confess my feelings to him. I did and got rejected right then and there. It took me a year to move on. I limited the interaction with guys. I also rejected many proposals. My parents and psychiatrist tried to convince me to get married but I resisted and thankfully they never forced me. I finished my studies and got a job in my university. After many years of staying single, I got bored and decided to have a guy friend, thus again I started a phone relationship with Liam and since I was 30, I was not scared to meet him. We met and after hours of talking, we started making out. I had non-existent sex life before that and I badly wanted to lose my virginity but I resisted when he was penetrating and I asked him to stop but he didn’t. It led me to the trauma and I was not the person I once used to be. He tried to compensate that with oral sex but couldn’t get me off. He was a wrong guy, he gaslighted and blackmailed me after that. I got yeast infection after having sex with him and pregnancy scare too since we did it without protection. I couldn’t block him until December last year because I was worried about my safety. He had my every detail and nude screenshots and I was so scared he would do something with it.
Meanwhile, I got infatuated with my colleague (Alex) since we were talking for a month. We clicked on so many levels, our interests were alike and we both were talkative. I had never had a crush on anyone since last 8 years and I was overwhelmed with the fact that I still can develop feelings but he was married having kids. I told him about my mental health issues and he was so supportive and friendly. He was attracted with me too so we met one day and he initiated a hug and peck on my lips and I felt so emotional that I confessed my feelings right there. He got worried and said that he likes me so much but due to societal constraints he can’t marry me but wants to see me happy in my life. I started sobbing and he comforted me and left.
We met after two days and he asked me how was our interaction off late? I responded positively, then he advised me to not believe in love and just enjoy the moment. He offered me with a long drive and an ice cream treat and I became excited for his company. We went on a long drive and talked about different topics and then he parked his car beside lake and we hugged, one thing led to another and we made out but there wasn’t penetration because he prematurely ejaculated. I, who had such a little experience with men, started sobbing once I reached home, developed anxiety questioning myself what was I doing. He apparently had no feelings for me and his action was totally not romantic. But, I was so much infatuated with him that I met him again the next day but I resisted his every move and confronted him with “Are you looking for just hookups?” He told me he would rather masturbate than engaging in meaningless sex, he wants to develop a deep connection with me with mutual respect, trust, and companionship, and sex just happens between two individuals who are connected and attracted to each other. And physical touch and kissing made him so excited that he wanted sex then and there. Same was the case with me but I was skeptic of his intentions. I asked him about his previous relationships, he told me each and everything and when he asked me about mine, I lied to him about my virginity and didn’t tell him about my not-so-good only physical encounter. I told him I am inserting stuff in my vagina for years. I was scared to tell him everything. We met again after few days and we finally had sex but it lasted for few seconds. Next meeting, he questioned me about my lie stating that he has no problem with that and I can tell him the truth but I remained adamant and never told the truth until December last year after 8 months.
We met again few times during which we had sex but it never lasted more than just 30 seconds. I wanted more. I asked him about that and he stated that he had no idea why he wasn’t able to last longer and laughed it out that since you’re so hot I couldn’t last longer. Though he tried so much to get me off by other means but to no avail. First time in my life, I got worried about my future sex life because I was able to climax during solo masturbation but not in a mutual setting. And, since I was yearning for his presence in my life wanting to start a proper relationship with him, I used to cry for hours daily because it was not possible. I tried to tell him about my feelings for few times but he teased me and made fun of it. I was remaining more anxious during our meet-ups and he asked me about my diminishing libido. I stated that since we’re not together I am unable to keep up with this relation. After that day, he ghosted me for almost two months and suddenly appeared again after vacation. I was still infatuated with him even though suffered from severe depression in those months. My parents got worried for my health and I couldn’t tell them or my psychiatrist about my situation. We went on a long drive and he lectured me to get married to a suitable person. I was devastated but gathered myself and nodded. He dropped me home and again disappeared.

Similar to many of your experiences i’ve been porn addicted for years ( probably since i was 11 and i am now 26 ) but i think i realized the severity of it when i could not stay aroused during a hookup with someone and needed the use of porn to keep going. It was embarrassing and caused me to think about other aspects of my life where it’s effecting me too ( energy levels , motivation, lack of ability to connect to someone ) i’ve never committed to nofap but i’m hoping i can get back what i lost and hopefully reap some benefits as well. Stay strong my dudes

I’m talking specifically when you go to meet them and their cock is much smaller than the photos? Do you go with it or do you say something?

There is just no telling how high the rate of gay will get in Utah now that access to straight porn on Pornhub has been restricted. Church leaders must act now to launch the Porn Again revival.

The Use of Identity Politics to Undermine the Left Anna Coco
The US government and ruling elite have infiltrated and attempted to destroy the Left since its inception. In the 1960’s the CIA think tanks came up with numerous strategies to destroy the Left, such as promoting drug use and promiscuous sexuality as a form of not only “Brave New World” escapism, but diverting attention from working class issues. Remember Jerry Garcia repeating Timothy Leary’s famous quote “turn on, tune in, and drop out?” Even the decriminalization of marijuana today is really not to stop the Prison Industrial Complex, which is still arresting millions of young men, especially those of colour, but about pushing escapism as a replacement for protesting in a country where half the population lives near or below the poverty line. “Get high; forget your cares.” “Don’t fight back. Jesus was a pacifist.” (Forget that Jesus flogged the bankers in the temple during Passover.) The Communist Party USA and other Left parties were successful in pushing back this degeneration, discouraging drug and alcohol use as well as criticizing sexual objectification, particularly of women.
Another government strategy involved promoting Identity Politics, which along with political correctness in the late 1980’s actually achieved its goal of successfully undermining the Left as can be seen in its current state. This time period wasn’t coincidental, since this was the time the Berlin Wall fell and the Soviet Union was collapsing. It was at this point that the Left started turning inward and becoming fragmented, with no centre to keep it together which is what the Soviet Union represented. Feeling betrayed, demoralized, and bewildered, the CIA easily infiltrated and injected the Left with its poisonous sting, causing many Left parties to reject dialectical materialism, and in some cases even Marxism itself! ID politics was the late 1960’s brain child of the CIA to divide and conquer the Left, pitting groups against each other. Political Correctness helped promote ID politics by using the same methods as McCarthyism. Since socialism is a logical, scientific economic system, proponents couldn’t be allowed to explain or discuss what is was or it would convert others; therefore McCarthyism relied on shutting down debates and free discussion by employing name calling, shouting down speakers, and further isolating and marginalizing Leftists, especially through blacklisting them.
From the 1930’s to the 1970’s the motto of the Communist Party and the Left was “Black and White Unite”. The question for example of the CP getting involved, whether in the Scottsboro Case or in unionizing the segregated South, took place with many open debates, where all questions were allowed to be raised, discussed, and answered, including those by less advanced white workers who didn’t understand or agree. It was the openness of these discussions and debates that allowed this sector to understand the nature of racism and to make the CP’s motto a success. In a nation that was then only 12% black, gaining white support during the Civil Rights era was crucial in changing the nation and its laws. The Black Panther Party understood this and gave talk in some of the poorest white communities such as in the Appalachians; even converting and forming important alliances with white working class organizations, such as the Young Patriots in Chicago.
The CIA unfortunately successfully changed “Black and White Unite” into Identity Politics in the 1970’s, where different special interest groups began vying for crumbs, promoting selfish individualism and rejecting collectivism, one of the basic foundations of Marxist Leninist ideology.
Following bourgeois feminism, white men were now the enemy and women felt pitted to fight men in order to demand more managerial jobs. Blacks began demanding the right to have more black police officers; as if women oppressing other women or black officers cracking the heads of black men was somehow progressive. What followers of ID politics failed to understand was that changing the driver didn’t change the system. My chances as a woman of dying from a preventable heart attack are the same whether the doctor at the hospital today is male or female, as are the chances a black man having his head smashed in by the cops whether the officer is white or black. Instead of collectivism, workers divided among race, sex, ethnicity, religion, etc., promoting selfish individualism. Of course there are supportive women and people of colour. But certain individuals are not the system. A perfect example was the Left dismantling the anti-war movement during the Obama administration because it would be seen as racist to protest a black president. What was forgotten were the millions killed abroad in US wars of Imperialism, especially Africans who didn’t care what race the current president was. As a result, today, Libyan men are being sold into slavery!
Whereas before ID politics, the enemy was clearly understood to be US imperialism, or the 1%, now the enemy had become the white, heterosexual, male workers. Marxists understand that white men are not our enemies, but our necessary allies in getting reforms under capitalism and in overthrowing the true enemy, the 1%. United we stand, divided we fall.
Unfortunately this vilification and exclusion of white males led to bitterness, creating the racism and sexism we see today. Many were driven into the arms of the right-wing in order to feel included. Enter transgender ideology, the new ID politics of today. Exploiting the Lesbian, gay, and bisexual movement, although the ideology itself is anti-gay and homophobic, it has been promoting itself as the Civil Rights movement of the 21st century. Let’s forget that Native people, African-Americans, and women still haven’t won many significant civil rights.
If white men were the enemy of yesteryear, women are now the new enemy, regardless of colour or race, allowing men their turn to experience inclusion in the Left by attacking and excluding women.
It’s not for nothing that penises are still called penises, but vaginas are front-holes, breast-feeding is chest-feeding, and woman can get their monthlies just like men (although I would seriously suggest that any man who does should go see a doctor ASAP and have their hemorrhoids put back in). Because transgender ideology, which is not the same as transgender individuals, just as all feminists are not bourgeois feminists, is a two-pronged attack not just against women, but the Left, too.
Its first prong of attack undermines women’s contribution to reproducing capital, both as the sex that bears tomorrow workers and cannon fodder and as workers. Discussions on birth control, maternity leave, food stamps, public services, as well as low wages and work inequality along with sexual harassment that affect working class women, become subordinate to transgender questions that affect less than 1/10 of 1% of the population, such as unisex bathrooms.
The second prong undermines the unity of the Left and the possibility of revolution. As Lenin said, “There can be no real mass movement without the women.” How can there be when women represent half the population and are the most exploited sex under crapitalism? In fact, how many people are aware that every major revolution in history was started by women? From the English, French, and the Russian Revolution, which by the way took place on March 8, 1917, International Women’s Day, it was women demanding bread that began it all. It is women who generally have to take care of and feed the family, especially the children. Prevent women from organizing or leading their own organizations, and the 1% are guaranteed there will be no reform or revolution.
What is Marxism? What does it represent? It doesn’t represent Hegelian idealism nor does it represent bourgeois mechanistic science. It represents a historical, dialectical materialism that analyzes the evolution of human society from one form to another, as Charles Darwin’s theories in the Origin of the Species analyzed the evolution of living beings.
Much of the transgender movement isn’t even working class; it mainly represents white, upper middle-class males who are racist, homophobic, and misogynist. It argues for gender stereotypes that tell homosexual men, for example, that they are really women or that racism is an imaginary concept. When transwomen says they are women, they are in fact negating not just biology and science, but eliminating the whole history of oppression that women experience. You heard the expression, you are what you eat. Imagine someone saying “I ate some soul food last night and I’m feeling black, although I’ve never seen a black person in my lilywhite town.”
Transgender ideology has set a dangerous precedent by referring to feelings rather than biology, which ultimately allows discrimination not just against women, but people of colour including native people.
Women aren’t oppressed because of a feeling, but because of their sex; for physically being the only sex that can literally reproduce the workers for capital. Being a woman isn’t a feeling. Just like being black isn’t a feeling. Being a Native American isn’t a feeling. I can’t wash off my sex any more than a person of colour can wash off their colour. Is capitalism a feeling, too? Can we unfeel exploitation on Monday morning?
Liberals who reject dialectical materialism reject nature and the evolutionary connection in nature.
Transgender ideology is effectively using language to erase women and subordinate them to the fetishes of men in nearly every English-speaking country. With the passing in England of the Gender Recognition Act, which Congress is trying to pass in the US as the Equality Act, women must defer to men as men now have the right to enter female facilities and colonize female sports at will against the wishes of women and the safety of girls. It took until 1920 for women in the US to have separate bathrooms, which Russian women won in the 1917 revolution. Lenin in fact championed female-only spaces and female leadership in female organizations. Really, how many women would like to turn around in the women’s showers and see a throbbing hard boner on a transgender woman staring at you? What about at a Rape Centre or women’s prison? For those who don’t know, it’s already happening: paedophiles and male rapists insisting they feel like women have been allowed into girls’ bathrooms and even placed in women’s prisons where they have raped women. Female sports and scholarships, better kiss that goodbye as men by birth have a physical advantage over women. Let’s go back to 1950’s America.
When the Left so wholehearted absorbed trans ideology, it threw scientific socialism under the bus as well as thoroughly self-destructing, making it the butt of jokes for the right-wing. From Black Lives Matter to FRSO Left, ISO, WWP, CWL, and PC USA to name just a few, all these organizations are now being redubbed Politically Correct USA.
It is rape to ever demand or try to coerce someone to have sex regardless of their age, sex, or gender. There is no place in any civilized society to allow rape or rape culture, and especially not the Left. In other cases, women were expelled for exposing male sexual predators, such as in ISO, DSA, WWP, and PC USA. I was told I should be ashamed of myself for shaming the PC USA by exposing a predator, when that party should be ashamed. In other cases, women were expelled because they didn’t agree with male comrades over the question of prostitution and violent porn. Imagine the outrage if a black man was stripped of his position and expelled, because he didn’t like to be called an N* and didn’t agree that slavery and lynching films weren’t empowering? In fact, why is the Left offended by Black Face, but not by Drag? Transgenderism is misogyny in drag.
Soros has spent over millions of dollars promoting transgenderism. Yet women on the Left who complained were ridiculed and silenced.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the CP subverted itself to neoliberalism when it decided to pimp itself to the Democratic Party. Even the ISO, FRSO right and many other so-called Left parties began embracing bourgeois liberalism, which has its roots in neo-liberalism or the free market economy, completing wedding themselves to parliamentary instead revolutionary goals.
Think of the level of misogyny; the CIA couldn’t destroy so many grousp like WW, which has existed for 60 years. How did it finally destroy these parties through transgenderism? Before we think this is an organic movement, which is separate from being transgender, it is actually funded by the CIA and its think tanks. That is the reason why it funded by so much money. Any legitimate organization would distance itself from these elements and I’m sure there are LGBTQ+ organizations that did.
When the National Center for Transgender Equality Action Fund hosted the 2018 Trans Equality Now Awards in Washington D.C. on May 17, 2018, its sponsors looked like something from a parody. The list included: the CIA, George Soros’ Open Society, Facebook (which is partially funded by the Atlantic Council, i.e. NATO), Google, Amazon, Capital One Bank, Shook, Hardy & Bacon (a law firm dedicated to defending Big Pharma), as well as a number of pharmaceutical companies and clinics including: Gilead Sciences, Meltzer Clinic, and Pharma. [See comments at the end of this article.] For women on the Left, this open display by the CIA and Soros was like the government and the bankers sticking their middle finger at them. It proved what they had been saying all along.
To this day, the Left still hasn’t apologized to women and is still promoting destructive ID politics, pushing women to the hypocritical right-wing. It makes perfect sense for liberals to be doing this, because as their name suggests neo-liberalism, they want to push women to the right. But why the Left? In fact, why was the Left so eager to adopt trans ideology and expel women.
Either promote the Left, that is the Left we’ve inherited and, like a corrupt union, we understand as Marxist-Leninists that we don’t destroy, but attempt to revitalize, or create female Left organizations like Women for Racial and Economic Equality to push Left more left.
Comment on sources
The source for the CIA and others having funded the 2018 Trans Equality Now Awards seems to have “disappeared” from the internet, and they seem to have decided that their sponsorship of the 2019 awards would have been too open. However, after some searching, we were able to find the Transgender Equality Annual Report 2017, at: https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/resources/annual%20report%20 2017%20final.pdf (page 8; page 10 of pdf), which includes the same sponsors as in 2018.
Also, Soros’ Open Society Foundations has funded individual transgender activists who are leaders in various Left organizations. One is Imani Henry, a leading member of International Action Center and Workers World Party. The source of this is available at: https://www. opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/cfp_20050101.pdf, on p. 10-11. This criticism is more aimed at his party than at him himself, for allowing him to accept this funding, just as no progressive trade union organization would have its members accept money from the American Institute for Free Labor Development (AIFLD), a notorious conduit for CIA funding.
As sources mysteriously disappear from the internet, we have put these sources on the web-site used by Towards Marxist-Leninist Unity (www.RedStarPublishers.org).
Towards Marxist-Leninist Unity

The Use of Identity Politics to Undermine the Left Anna Coco
The US government and ruling elite have infiltrated and attempted to destroy the Left since its inception. In the 1960’s the CIA think tanks came up with numerous strategies to destroy the Left, such as promoting drug use and promiscuous sexuality as a form of not only “Brave New World” escapism, but diverting attention from working class issues. Remember Jerry Garcia repeating Timothy Leary’s famous quote “turn on, tune in, and drop out?” Even the decriminalization of marijuana today is really not to stop the Prison Industrial Complex, which is still arresting millions of young men, especially those of colour, but about pushing escapism as a replacement for protesting in a country where half the population lives near or below the poverty line. “Get high; forget your cares.” “Don’t fight back. Jesus was a pacifist.” (Forget that Jesus flogged the bankers in the temple during Passover.) The Communist Party USA and other Left parties were successful in pushing back this degeneration, discouraging drug and alcohol use as well as criticizing sexual objectification, particularly of women.
Another government strategy involved promoting Identity Politics, which along with political correctness in the late 1980’s actually achieved its goal of successfully undermining the Left as can be seen in its current state. This time period wasn’t coincidental, since this was the time the Berlin Wall fell and the Soviet Union was collapsing. It was at this point that the Left started turning inward and becoming fragmented, with no centre to keep it together which is what the Soviet Union represented. Feeling betrayed, demoralized, and bewildered, the CIA easily infiltrated and injected the Left with its poisonous sting, causing many Left parties to reject dialectical materialism, and in some cases even Marxism itself! ID politics was the late 1960’s brain child of the CIA to divide and conquer the Left, pitting groups against each other. Political Correctness helped promote ID politics by using the same methods as McCarthyism. Since socialism is a logical, scientific economic system, proponents couldn’t be allowed to explain or discuss what is was or it would convert others; therefore McCarthyism relied on shutting down debates and free discussion by employing name calling, shouting down speakers, and further isolating and marginalizing Leftists, especially through blacklisting them.
From the 1930’s to the 1970’s the motto of the Communist Party and the Left was “Black and White Unite”. The question for example of the CP getting involved, whether in the Scottsboro Case or in unionizing the segregated South, took place with many open debates, where all questions were allowed to be raised, discussed, and answered, including those by less advanced white workers who didn’t understand or agree. It was the openness of these discussions and debates that allowed this sector to understand the nature of racism and to make the CP’s motto a success. In a nation that was then only 12% black, gaining white support during the Civil Rights era was crucial in changing the nation and its laws. The Black Panther Party understood this and gave talk in some of the poorest white communities such as in the Appalachians; even converting and forming important alliances with white working class organizations, such as the Young Patriots in Chicago.
The CIA unfortunately successfully changed “Black and White Unite” into Identity Politics in the 1970’s, where different special interest groups began vying for crumbs, promoting selfish individualism and rejecting collectivism, one of the basic foundations of Marxist Leninist ideology.
Following bourgeois feminism, white men were now the enemy and women felt pitted to fight men in order to demand more managerial jobs. Blacks began demanding the right to have more black police officers; as if women oppressing other women or black officers cracking the heads of black men was somehow progressive. What followers of ID politics failed to understand was that changing the driver didn’t change the system. My chances as a woman of dying from a preventable heart attack are the same whether the doctor at the hospital today is male or female, as are the chances a black man having his head smashed in by the cops whether the officer is white or black. Instead of collectivism, workers divided among race, sex, ethnicity, religion, etc., promoting selfish individualism. Of course there are supportive women and people of colour. But certain individuals are not the system. A perfect example was the Left dismantling the anti-war movement during the Obama administration because it would be seen as racist to protest a black president. What was forgotten were the millions killed abroad in US wars of Imperialism, especially Africans who didn’t care what race the current president was. As a result, today, Libyan men are being sold into slavery!
Whereas before ID politics, the enemy was clearly understood to be US imperialism, or the 1%, now the enemy had become the white, heterosexual, male workers. Marxists understand that white men are not our enemies, but our necessary allies in getting reforms under capitalism and in overthrowing the true enemy, the 1%. United we stand, divided we fall.
Unfortunately this vilification and exclusion of white males led to bitterness, creating the racism and sexism we see today. Many were driven into the arms of the right-wing in order to feel included. Enter transgender ideology, the new ID politics of today. Exploiting the Lesbian, gay, and bisexual movement, although the ideology itself is anti-gay and homophobic, it has been promoting itself as the Civil Rights movement of the 21st century. Let’s forget that Native people, African-Americans, and women still haven’t won many significant civil rights.
If white men were the enemy of yesteryear, women are now the new enemy, regardless of colour or race, allowing men their turn to experience inclusion in the Left by attacking and excluding women.
It’s not for nothing that penises are still called penises, but vaginas are front-holes, breast-feeding is chest-feeding, and woman can get their monthlies just like men (although I would seriously suggest that any man who does should go see a doctor ASAP and have their hemorrhoids put back in). Because transgender ideology, which is not the same as transgender individuals, just as all feminists are not bourgeois feminists, is a two-pronged attack not just against women, but the Left, too.
Its first prong of attack undermines women’s contribution to reproducing capital, both as the sex that bears tomorrow workers and cannon fodder and as workers. Discussions on birth control, maternity leave, food stamps, public services, as well as low wages and work inequality along with sexual harassment that affect working class women, become subordinate to transgender questions that affect less than 1/10 of 1% of the population, such as unisex bathrooms.
The second prong undermines the unity of the Left and the possibility of revolution. As Lenin said, “There can be no real mass movement without the women.” How can there be when women represent half the population and are the most exploited sex under crapitalism? In fact, how many people are aware that every major revolution in history was started by women? From the English, French, and the Russian Revolution, which by the way took place on March 8, 1917, International Women’s Day, it was women demanding bread that began it all. It is women who generally have to take care of and feed the family, especially the children. Prevent women from organizing or leading their own organizations, and the 1% are guaranteed there will be no reform or revolution.
What is Marxism? What does it represent? It doesn’t represent Hegelian idealism nor does it represent bourgeois mechanistic science. It represents a historical, dialectical materialism that analyzes the evolution of human society from one form to another, as Charles Darwin’s theories in the Origin of the Species analyzed the evolution of living beings.
Much of the transgender movement isn’t even working class; it mainly represents white, upper middle-class males who are racist, homophobic, and misogynist. It argues for gender stereotypes that tell homosexual men, for example, that they are really women or that racism is an imaginary concept. When transwomen says they are women, they are in fact negating not just biology and science, but eliminating the whole history of oppression that women experience. You heard the expression, you are what you eat. Imagine someone saying “I ate some soul food last night and I’m feeling black, although I’ve never seen a black person in my lilywhite town.”
Transgender ideology has set a dangerous precedent by referring to feelings rather than biology, which ultimately allows discrimination not just against women, but people of colour including native people.
Women aren’t oppressed because of a feeling, but because of their sex; for physically being the only sex that can literally reproduce the workers for capital. Being a woman isn’t a feeling. Just like being black isn’t a feeling. Being a Native American isn’t a feeling. I can’t wash off my sex any more than a person of colour can wash off their colour. Is capitalism a feeling, too? Can we unfeel exploitation on Monday morning?
Liberals who reject dialectical materialism reject nature and the evolutionary connection in nature.
Transgender ideology is effectively using language to erase women and subordinate them to the fetishes of men in nearly every English-speaking country. With the passing in England of the Gender Recognition Act, which Congress is trying to pass in the US as the Equality Act, women must defer to men as men now have the right to enter female facilities and colonize female sports at will against the wishes of women and the safety of girls. It took until 1920 for women in the US to have separate bathrooms, which Russian women won in the 1917 revolution. Lenin in fact championed female-only spaces and female leadership in female organizations. Really, how many women would like to turn around in the women’s showers and see a throbbing hard boner on a transgender woman staring at you? What about at a Rape Centre or women’s prison? For those who don’t know, it’s already happening: paedophiles and male rapists insisting they feel like women have been allowed into girls’ bathrooms and even placed in women’s prisons where they have raped women. Female sports and scholarships, better kiss that goodbye as men by birth have a physical advantage over women. Let’s go back to 1950’s America.
When the Left so wholehearted absorbed trans ideology, it threw scientific socialism under the bus as well as thoroughly self-destructing, making it the butt of jokes for the right-wing. From Black Lives Matter to FRSO Left, ISO, WWP, CWL, and PC USA to name just a few, all these organizations are now being redubbed Politically Correct USA.
It is rape to ever demand or try to coerce someone to have sex regardless of their age, sex, or gender. There is no place in any civilized society to allow rape or rape culture, and especially not the Left. In other cases, women were expelled for exposing male sexual predators, such as in ISO, DSA, WWP, and PC USA. I was told I should be ashamed of myself for shaming the PC USA by exposing a predator, when that party should be ashamed. In other cases, women were expelled because they didn’t agree with male comrades over the question of prostitution and violent porn. Imagine the outrage if a black man was stripped of his position and expelled, because he didn’t like to be called an N* and didn’t agree that slavery and lynching films weren’t empowering? In fact, why is the Left offended by Black Face, but not by Drag? Transgenderism is misogyny in drag.
Soros has spent over millions of dollars promoting transgenderism. Yet women on the Left who complained were ridiculed and silenced.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the CP subverted itself to neoliberalism when it decided to pimp itself to the Democratic Party. Even the ISO, FRSO right and many other so-called Left parties began embracing bourgeois liberalism, which has its roots in neo-liberalism or the free market economy, completing wedding themselves to parliamentary instead revolutionary goals.
Think of the level of misogyny; the CIA couldn’t destroy so many grousp like WW, which has existed for 60 years. How did it finally destroy these parties through transgenderism? Before we think this is an organic movement, which is separate from being transgender, it is actually funded by the CIA and its think tanks. That is the reason why it funded by so much money. Any legitimate organization would distance itself from these elements and I’m sure there are LGBTQ+ organizations that did.
When the National Center for Transgender Equality Action Fund hosted the 2018 Trans Equality Now Awards in Washington D.C. on May 17, 2018, its sponsors looked like something from a parody. The list included: the CIA, George Soros’ Open Society, Facebook (which is partially funded by the Atlantic Council, i.e. NATO), Google, Amazon, Capital One Bank, Shook, Hardy & Bacon (a law firm dedicated to defending Big Pharma), as well as a number of pharmaceutical companies and clinics including: Gilead Sciences, Meltzer Clinic, and Pharma. [See comments at the end of this article.] For women on the Left, this open display by the CIA and Soros was like the government and the bankers sticking their middle finger at them. It proved what they had been saying all along.
To this day, the Left still hasn’t apologized to women and is still promoting destructive ID politics, pushing women to the hypocritical right-wing. It makes perfect sense for liberals to be doing this, because as their name suggests neo-liberalism, they want to push women to the right. But why the Left? In fact, why was the Left so eager to adopt trans ideology and expel women.
Either promote the Left, that is the Left we’ve inherited and, like a corrupt union, we understand as Marxist-Leninists that we don’t destroy, but attempt to revitalize, or create female Left organizations like Women for Racial and Economic Equality to push Left more left.
Comment on sources
The source for the CIA and others having funded the 2018 Trans Equality Now Awards seems to have “disappeared” from the internet, and they seem to have decided that their sponsorship of the 2019 awards would have been too open. However, after some searching, we were able to find the Transgender Equality Annual Report 2017, at: https://transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/resources/annual%20report%20 2017%20final.pdf (page 8; page 10 of pdf), which includes the same sponsors as in 2018.
Also, Soros’ Open Society Foundations has funded individual transgender activists who are leaders in various Left organizations. One is Imani Henry, a leading member of International Action Center and Workers World Party. The source of this is available at: https://www. opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/cfp_20050101.pdf, on p. 10-11. This criticism is more aimed at his party than at him himself, for allowing him to accept this funding, just as no progressive trade union organization would have its members accept money from the American Institute for Free Labor Development (AIFLD), a notorious conduit for CIA funding.
As sources mysteriously disappear from the internet, we have put these sources on the web-site used by Towards Marxist-Leninist Unity (www.RedStarPublishers.org).
Towards Marxist-Leninist Unity

planning
I would like to plan an evening/overnight event for bi sexual guys to cum together in a sleazy hotel room for mutual pleasure of jerking off to porn, head or even fucking. Bi’s, gays and the curious together. Might even include a whore in the mix. Please let me know if you are interested. I envision many dicks, holes and cum.

My ex and I have been in a relationship for about 10 months, however I lied to them about something for a very long time and eventually came clean. It was my fault completely; not debating or getting into detail about that part. We then had an emotional talk where we both said we still love each other, still want to marry someday, and can consider getting back together in a couple of months. But for now, we both need to find out what being in a relationship truly means.
We still talk all the time because we're best friends and the only thing that has changed is we acknowledge we aren't dating, but we tell each other everything.
During that talk, he mentioned that he wasn't going to sleep around or hookup and that he's not like that. Which I believe, because we haven't been very physical together for months out of us not feeling it. However, I usually peruse grindr out of fun to see some of the silly and down bad messages I receive (he knows about it completely and is completely ok with it).
And this week, I saw his account twice by accident, and I knew that a month ago it was deactivated. The first time, his account was completely the same as the day we first met, but the second time, his account was completely new with a ton of very explicit pictures and an alluring bio. As well, he has been online constantly, and I could tell he shaved his whole body which he hasn't done in months because it's very tiring, and he hates it and only does it if he's trying to be physical.
So all of this tells me that he's clearly fantasizing about hooking up, or is going to. So my problem is that I am completely ok with him hooking up considering we're not dating atm, but he explicitly told me he wasn't going to. And we have been talking all the time since the break because we're still best friends, and he hasn't mentioned this to me at all. So it just seems like he's avoiding telling me or simply doesn't want to.
And while I respect his privacy, and I know it's creepy to have seen his accounts like this, I know I'm not in the right by any means for trying to figure out what he's doing behind closed doors or the fact that our relationship is on a break because of me. I am simply asking advice on where to go from here.
Should I tell him what I know or wait for time to tell? Im just very confused and sad about this

So, I met up with a guy to go for a drink tonight, I had been chatting to him on grindr for a few days.
I'm already quite an anxious person, but I've been going through a lot the past few weeks so I haven't really been myself.
I was quite nervous and not very talkative but he was quite loud and confident.
Anyway, he gave me his card to get some drinks, I got 2 pints of beer and a pint of water. I was holding them in my hands and walking out of the bar to the outdoor seating area.
Then, this guy is like "you've done well there, mate" initially I thought he meant about me carrying 3 pints, I just smiled and carried on.
Then I realised, hew was referring to the guy I was with, it really hurt me.
There was 3 gay guys and one girl, 2 of the guys were somewhat overweight, the other was obese. They were all obviously bottoms too, one wearing heavy makeup.
The guy I was with was tall, quite muscular, cute face, looks and acts masculine, I'm kind of in-between. You can tell I put effort into my appearance, I'm young Looking, no facial hair, my facial features are more feminine, plus I'm slim.
It really ruined my night, I felt ugly, embarrassed and stupid for not realising sooner what he meant and saying something back to him.
The thing is, everybody says I'm pretty, beautiful, gorgeous, cute. The guy I was with was doing his best to impress me, he paid for all the drinks, I could tell he was nervous and wanted me to like him, he even asked me if I did a few times.
I've attracted a lot "hotter" guys, I've dated models, rugby players, etc. Like, the guy I was with tonight was good looking but even he said he thought I was far more attractive. I guess maybe because I'm more pretty than handsome, I get a lot of attention from "straight guys".
I feel like the guy that said that to me was just being salty and was jealous. I was minding my own business, I even got hit on by a beautiful girl, she grabbed my hand started dancing with me and then when she could tell I wasn't interested she just caressed my cheek and walked off.
I don't understand why he'd make a comment like that, they were all just being salty. Usually I'd have a retort and hurt his feelings but as I said I was feeling shitty anyway and that was just the cherry on top. I ended up leaving after my next drink and I've felt bad since.
What do you guys think he meant like that? I'm aware this post comes across as superficial, especially me talking about how attractive I am and describing those guys not in the best way, but I'm hurt, people expect me to be confident and tough but I'm not.
Like literally I get hit on by random guys in the store, on the street, etc. So I don't get it :( I'm still insecure as fuck.

I’m in a relationship. My boyfriend and I are people of color (23f/23m). Recently I’ve had an odd fixation on white men.. Idk if I’ve been watching too much cinema or something but I’ve been really attracted and I’m not sure why. Any time I watch porn I’m searching bwc or when I hookup with my bf I imagine his dick is white and lately that’s how i’ve been able to come. It’s just really different for me and i don’t have anyone to ask about this given how awkward it is

I was taught this several times in the church. Leaders said people became gay because they’d get exposed to gay porn as a teen and still be turned on, so they figured they must be gay. Was this common? Or did I just have weird leaders?
This is different from the other theory I learned a lot that you masturbate, get fixated on your own genitals, and then become gay. That was in a lot of publications so I think that was pretty common.